From: Tejun Heo Subject: Re: [PATCH 09/10] workqueue: implement NUMA affinity for unbound workqueues Date: Wed, 20 Mar 2013 08:05:54 -0700 Message-ID: <20130320150554.GX3042@htj.dyndns.org> References: <1363737629-16745-1-git-send-email-tj@kernel.org> <1363737629-16745-10-git-send-email-tj@kernel.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: laijs@cn.fujitsu.com, axboe@kernel.dk, jack@suse.cz, fengguang.wu@intel.com, jmoyer@redhat.com, zab@redhat.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, herbert@gondor.apana.org.au, davem@davemloft.net, linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org To: Lai Jiangshan Return-path: Received: from mail-pd0-f178.google.com ([209.85.192.178]:62957 "EHLO mail-pd0-f178.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751239Ab3CTPGA (ORCPT ); Wed, 20 Mar 2013 11:06:00 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-crypto-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Wed, Mar 20, 2013 at 11:03:53PM +0800, Lai Jiangshan wrote: > > +enomem: > > + free_workqueue_attrs(tmp_attrs); > > + if (pwq_tbl) { > > + for_each_node(node) > > + kfree(pwq_tbl[node]); > > It will free the dfl_pwq multi times. Oops, you're right. We need to do for_eahc_node(node) if (pwq_tbl[node] != dfl_pwq) kfree(pwq_tbl[node]); kfree(dfl_pwq); Thanks! -- tejun