From: Tejun Heo Subject: Re: [PATCH 09/10] workqueue: implement NUMA affinity for unbound workqueues Date: Wed, 20 Mar 2013 08:32:19 -0700 Message-ID: References: <1363737629-16745-1-git-send-email-tj@kernel.org> <1363737629-16745-10-git-send-email-tj@kernel.org> <20130320150554.GX3042@htj.dyndns.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Cc: laijs@cn.fujitsu.com, axboe@kernel.dk, jack@suse.cz, fengguang.wu@intel.com, jmoyer@redhat.com, zab@redhat.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, herbert@gondor.apana.org.au, davem@davemloft.net, linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org To: Lai Jiangshan Return-path: Received: from mail-qc0-f175.google.com ([209.85.216.175]:58181 "EHLO mail-qc0-f175.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750902Ab3CTPcU (ORCPT ); Wed, 20 Mar 2013 11:32:20 -0400 In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-crypto-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Wed, Mar 20, 2013 at 8:26 AM, Lai Jiangshan wrote: >> for_eahc_node(node) >> if (pwq_tbl[node] != dfl_pwq) >> kfree(pwq_tbl[node]); >> kfree(dfl_pwq); > > I also missed. > we still need to put_unbound_pool() before free(pwq) Yeap, we do. Wonder whether we can just use put_pwq() there. I'll see if I can. -- tejun