From: Tejun Heo Subject: Re: [PATCHSET wq/for-3.10] workqueue: NUMA affinity for unbound workqueues Date: Mon, 25 Mar 2013 12:15:00 -0700 Message-ID: <20130325191500.GA12767@htj.dyndns.org> References: <1363737629-16745-1-git-send-email-tj@kernel.org> <20130320185708.GB31256@htj.dyndns.org> <20130324185506.GA4378@htj.dyndns.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: laijs@cn.fujitsu.com, axboe@kernel.dk, jack@suse.cz, fengguang.wu@intel.com, jmoyer@redhat.com, zab@redhat.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, herbert@gondor.apana.org.au, davem@davemloft.net, linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org To: Lai Jiangshan Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20130324185506.GA4378@htj.dyndns.org> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-crypto.vger.kernel.org On Sun, Mar 24, 2013 at 11:55:06AM -0700, Tejun Heo wrote: > > the whole patchset is more complicated than my brain. > > It isn't that complex, is it? I mean, the difficult part - using > multiple pwqs on unbound wq - already happened, and even that wasn't > too complex as it in most part synchronized the behaviors between > per-cpu and unbound workqueues. All that NUMA support is doing is > mapping different pwqs to different issuing CPUs. Oh, BTW, please feel free to rebase your patchset on top of the current wq/for-3.10. I'll take care of the conflicts with the numa one, if there are any. Thanks. -- tejun