From: Shawn Landden Subject: Re: [PATCH] pipe_to_sendpage: Ensure that MSG_MORE is set if we set MSG_SENDPAGE_NOTLAST Date: Sun, 24 Nov 2013 17:40:06 -0800 Message-ID: References: <1385336527-27304-1-git-send-email-richard@nod.at> <1385342706.10637.125.camel@edumazet-glaptop2.roam.corp.google.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Cc: Richard Weinberger , Linux Kernel Mailing List , linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk, linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, Herbert Xu , Tom Herbert , "David S. Miller" , stable@vger.kernel.org To: Eric Dumazet Return-path: Received: from mail-ie0-f182.google.com ([209.85.223.182]:63958 "EHLO mail-ie0-f182.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751749Ab3KYBkI (ORCPT ); Sun, 24 Nov 2013 20:40:08 -0500 In-Reply-To: <1385342706.10637.125.camel@edumazet-glaptop2.roam.corp.google.com> Sender: linux-crypto-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Sun, Nov 24, 2013 at 5:25 PM, Eric Dumazet wrote: > On Mon, 2013-11-25 at 00:42 +0100, Richard Weinberger wrote: >> Commit 35f9c09fe (tcp: tcp_sendpages() should call tcp_push() once) >> added an internal flag MSG_SENDPAGE_NOTLAST. >> We have to ensure that MSG_MORE is also set if we set MSG_SENDPAGE_NOTLAST. >> Otherwise users that check against MSG_MORE will not see it. >> >> This fixes sendfile() on AF_ALG. >> >> Cc: Tom Herbert >> Cc: Eric Dumazet >> Cc: David S. Miller >> Cc: # 3.4.x >> Reported-and-tested-by: Shawn Landden >> Signed-off-by: Richard Weinberger >> --- >> fs/splice.c | 2 +- >> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) >> >> diff --git a/fs/splice.c b/fs/splice.c >> index 3b7ee65..b93f1b8 100644 >> --- a/fs/splice.c >> +++ b/fs/splice.c >> @@ -701,7 +701,7 @@ static int pipe_to_sendpage(struct pipe_inode_info *pipe, >> more = (sd->flags & SPLICE_F_MORE) ? MSG_MORE : 0; >> >> if (sd->len < sd->total_len && pipe->nrbufs > 1) >> - more |= MSG_SENDPAGE_NOTLAST; >> + more |= MSG_SENDPAGE_NOTLAST | MSG_MORE; >> >> return file->f_op->sendpage(file, buf->page, buf->offset, >> sd->len, &pos, more); > > I do not think this patch is right. It looks like a revert of a useful > patch for TCP zero copy. Given the time it took to discover this > regression, I bet tcp zero copy has more users than AF_ALG, by 5 or 6 > order of magnitude ;) > > Here we want to make the difference between the two flags, not merge > them. > > If AF_ALG do not care of the difference, try instead : > > diff --git a/crypto/algif_hash.c b/crypto/algif_hash.c > index ef5356cd280a..850246206b12 100644 > --- a/crypto/algif_hash.c > +++ b/crypto/algif_hash.c > @@ -114,6 +114,9 @@ static ssize_t hash_sendpage(struct socket *sock, struct page *page, > struct hash_ctx *ctx = ask->private; > int err; > > + if (flags & MSG_SENDPAGE_NOTLAST) > + flags |= MSG_MORE; > + > lock_sock(sk); > sg_init_table(ctx->sgl.sg, 1); > sg_set_page(ctx->sgl.sg, page, size, offset); > >From my testing this works. -- --- Shawn Landden +1 360 389 3001 (SMS preferred)