From: Andreas Schwab Subject: Re: [PATCH, RFC] random: introduce getrandom(2) system call Date: Sun, 20 Jul 2014 19:27:42 +0200 Message-ID: <87tx6cvt2p.fsf@igel.home> References: <1405588695-12014-1-git-send-email-tytso@mit.edu> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-abi@vger.kernel.org, linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org, beck@openbsd.org To: Theodore Ts'o Return-path: Received: from mail-out.m-online.net ([212.18.0.10]:60399 "EHLO mail-out.m-online.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752231AbaGTR1t (ORCPT ); Sun, 20 Jul 2014 13:27:49 -0400 In-Reply-To: <1405588695-12014-1-git-send-email-tytso@mit.edu> (Theodore Ts'o's message of "Thu, 17 Jul 2014 05:18:15 -0400") Sender: linux-crypto-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Theodore Ts'o writes: > ERRORS > EINVAL The buflen value was invalid. Also on unknown flags? Without that it would be impossible to probe for implemented flags. Andreas. -- Andreas Schwab, schwab@linux-m68k.org GPG Key fingerprint = 58CA 54C7 6D53 942B 1756 01D3 44D5 214B 8276 4ED5 "And now for something completely different."