From: Herbert Xu Subject: Re: [PATCH] Use memzero_explicit to clear local buffers Date: Mon, 5 Jan 2015 10:36:37 +1100 Message-ID: <20150104233637.GA20757@gondor.apana.org.au> References: <1420394744-20268-1-git-send-email-me@mortis.eu> <20150104213538.GA19906@gondor.apana.org.au> <20150104224909.GB4806@salidar.dom.custoft.eu> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, "David S. Miller" , Thomas Gleixner , Ingo Molnar , "H. Peter Anvin" , "maintainer:X86 ARCHITECTURE..." , Greg Kroah-Hartman , Steve French , Rahul Bedarkar , Thomas Pugliese , Randy Dunlap , Julia Lawall , "open list:CRYPTO API" , "open list:CERTIFIED WIRELES..." , "open list:COMMON INTERNET F..." , "moderated list:COMMON INTERNET F..." , Daniel Borkmann To: Giel van Schijndel Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20150104224909.GB4806-zsKMh+JvXepbNiWYSlF1AbANlwIBtoSN@public.gmane.org> Sender: linux-cifs-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org List-Id: linux-crypto.vger.kernel.org On Sun, Jan 04, 2015 at 11:49:09PM +0100, Giel van Schijndel wrote: > > > sctx does not point to stack memory so this is bogus. > > > > Only stack memory cleared just before it goes out of scope needs > > memzero_explicit. > > Is that because the compiler can't safely optimize memset(0) away for a > variable with greater-than-local scope? Exactly. memzero_explicit is not a marker for sensitive data. Its only purpose is to prevent the compiler from optimising away zeroing that occurs at the end of a scope. Daniel, we should add a comment so that people stop sending bogus patches with memzero_explicit. Cheers, -- Email: Herbert Xu Home Page: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/ PGP Key: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/pubkey.txt