From: Andrey Ryabinin Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm: kill kmemcheck Date: Wed, 11 Mar 2015 23:01:00 +0300 Message-ID: References: <55004595.7020304@oracle.com> <20150311.132052.205877953171712952.davem@davemloft.net> <55007A9B.4010608@oracle.com> <20150311.144443.1290707334236248572.davem@davemloft.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Cc: Sasha Levin , rostedt@goodmis.org, LKML , "linux-mm@kvack.org" , "netdev@vger.kernel.org" , linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel , linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org To: David Miller Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20150311.144443.1290707334236248572.davem@davemloft.net> Sender: linux-arch-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-crypto.vger.kernel.org 2015-03-11 21:44 GMT+03:00 David Miller : > From: Sasha Levin > Date: Wed, 11 Mar 2015 13:25:47 -0400 > >> You're probably wondering why there are changes to SPARC in that patchset? :) > > Libsanitizer doesn't even build have the time on sparc, the release > manager has to hand patch it into building again every major release > because of the way ASAN development is done out of tree and local > commits to the gcc tree are basically written over during the > next merge. > Libsanitizer is userspace lib it's for userspace ASan, KASan doesn't use it. We have our own 'libsanitzer' in kernel. > So I'm a little bit bitter about this, as you can see. :) > -- Best regards, Andrey Ryabinin