From: Steven Rostedt Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm: kill kmemcheck Date: Mon, 16 Mar 2015 22:33:18 -0400 Message-ID: <20150316223318.02145751@grimm.local.home> References: <1426074547-21888-1-git-send-email-sasha.levin@oracle.com> <20150311081909.552e2052@grimm.local.home> <55003666.3020100@oracle.com> <20150311084034.04ce6801@grimm.local.home> <55004595.7020304@oracle.com> <20150311102636.6b4110a8@gandalf.local.home> <55005491.5080809@oracle.com> <20150311105210.1855c95e@gandalf.local.home> <550787E7.1030604@oracle.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: LKML , linux-mm@kvack.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org, Linus Torvalds To: Sasha Levin Return-path: In-Reply-To: <550787E7.1030604@oracle.com> Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org List-Id: linux-crypto.vger.kernel.org On Mon, 16 Mar 2015 21:48:23 -0400 Sasha Levin wrote: > Steven, > > > Since the only objection raised was the too-newiness of GCC 4.9.2/5.0, what > would you consider a good time-line for removal? > > I haven't heard any "over my dead body" objections, so I guess that trying > to remove it while no distribution was shipping the compiler that would make > it possible was premature. > > Although, on the other hand, I'd be happy if we can have a reasonable date > (that is before my kid goes to college), preferably even before the next > LSF/MM so that we could have a mission accomplished thingie with a round > of beers and commemorative t-shirts. Perhaps give it 2 years? With fair notice that it will soon be gone? In 2 years I should be up to gcc 4.9 ;-) I still need to test it out. -- Steve -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: email@kvack.org