From: Herbert Xu Subject: Re: CCM/GCM implementation defect Date: Thu, 23 Apr 2015 17:05:45 +0800 Message-ID: <20150423090545.GA20369@gondor.apana.org.au> References: <20150423032619.GA17648@gondor.apana.org.au> <5538B56A.7060707@freescale.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE Cc: Steffen Klassert , netdev@vger.kernel.org, "David S. Miller" , Paul Wouters , Linux Crypto Mailing List To: Horia =?utf-8?Q?Geant=C4=83?= Return-path: Received: from helcar.hengli.com.au ([209.40.204.226]:41124 "EHLO helcar.hengli.com.au" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932092AbbDWJF7 (ORCPT ); Thu, 23 Apr 2015 05:05:59 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <5538B56A.7060707@freescale.com> Sender: linux-crypto-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Thu, Apr 23, 2015 at 12:03:38PM +0300, Horia Geant=C4=83 wrote: > This applies also to GMAC (rfc4543), right? No RFC4543 appears to be correctly implemented. > Does this mean that even the test vectors (crypto/testmgr.h) are brok= en? Indeed. The test vectors appear to be generated either through our implementation or by one that is identical to us. Cheers, --=20 Email: Herbert Xu Home Page: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/ PGP Key: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/pubkey.txt