From: Suravee Suthikulpanit Subject: Re: [V4 PATCH 2/6] arm64 : Introduce support for ACPI _CCA object Date: Sat, 16 May 2015 11:50:09 -0500 Message-ID: <55577541.1040400@amd.com> References: <1431724994-21601-1-git-send-email-Suravee.Suthikulpanit@amd.com> <1431724994-21601-3-git-send-email-Suravee.Suthikulpanit@amd.com> <1431776887.2341.17.camel@x220> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , To: Paul Bolle Return-path: In-Reply-To: <1431776887.2341.17.camel@x220> Sender: linux-acpi-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-crypto.vger.kernel.org Hi Paul, On 5/16/15 06:48, Paul Bolle wrote: > Just a nit regarding the commit explanation. > > On Fri, 2015-05-15 at 16:23 -0500, Suravee Suthikulpanit wrote: >> From http://www.uefi.org/sites/default/files/resources/ACPI_6.0.pdf, >> section 6.2.17 _CCA states that ARM platforms require ACPI _CCA >> object to be specified for DMA-cabpable devices. This patch introduces >> ACPI_MUST_HAVE_CCA in arm64 Kconfig to specify such requirement. > > s/ACPI_MUST_HAVE_CCA/ACPI_CCA_REQUIRED/. > > Ie, update the commit explanation to match the change introduced in V2. Ahh ... thanks :) Suravee