From: Suravee Suthikulanit Subject: Re: [V4 PATCH 2/6] arm64 : Introduce support for ACPI _CCA object Date: Wed, 20 May 2015 06:51:34 -0500 Message-ID: <555C7546.4040601@amd.com> References: <1431724994-21601-1-git-send-email-Suravee.Suthikulpanit@amd.com> <1431724994-21601-3-git-send-email-Suravee.Suthikulpanit@amd.com> <20150520100304.GE25313@e104818-lin.cambridge.arm.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , To: Catalin Marinas Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20150520100304.GE25313@e104818-lin.cambridge.arm.com> Sender: linux-acpi-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-crypto.vger.kernel.org On 5/20/2015 5:03 AM, Catalin Marinas wrote: > On Fri, May 15, 2015 at 04:23:10PM -0500, Suravee Suthikulpanit wrote: >> From http://www.uefi.org/sites/default/files/resources/ACPI_6.0.pdf, >> section 6.2.17 _CCA states that ARM platforms require ACPI _CCA >> object to be specified for DMA-cabpable devices. This patch introduces >> ACPI_MUST_HAVE_CCA in arm64 Kconfig to specify such requirement. >> >> In case _CCA is missing, arm64 would assign dummy_dma_ops >> to disable DMA capability of the device. >> >> Signed-off-by: Mark Salter >> Signed-off-by: Suravee Suthikulpanit >> CC: Catalin Marinas >> CC: Will Deacon >> CC: Arnd Bergmann > > Acked-by: Catalin Marinas > Thanks, Suravee