From: Alexander Duyck Subject: [net-next PATCH RFC 3/3] ip_vti/ip6_vti: Preserve skb->mark after rcv_cb call Date: Tue, 26 May 2015 15:41:29 -0700 Message-ID: <20150526224129.1328.69180.stgit@ahduyck-vm-fedora22> References: <20150526223849.1328.64212.stgit@ahduyck-vm-fedora22> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org To: steffen.klassert@secunet.com, davem@davemloft.net, herbert@gondor.apana.org.au Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20150526223849.1328.64212.stgit@ahduyck-vm-fedora22> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-crypto.vger.kernel.org The vti6_rcv_cb and vti_rcv_cb calls were leaving the skb->mark modified after completing the function. This resulted in the original skb->mark value being lost. Since we only need skb->mark to be set for xfrm_policy_check we can pull the assignment into the rcv_cb calls and then just restore the original mark after xfrm_policy_check has been completed. Signed-off-by: Alexander Duyck --- net/ipv4/ip_vti.c | 9 +++++++-- net/ipv6/ip6_vti.c | 9 +++++++-- 2 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) diff --git a/net/ipv4/ip_vti.c b/net/ipv4/ip_vti.c index 4c318e1c13c8..0c152087ca15 100644 --- a/net/ipv4/ip_vti.c +++ b/net/ipv4/ip_vti.c @@ -65,7 +65,6 @@ static int vti_input(struct sk_buff *skb, int nexthdr, __be32 spi, goto drop; XFRM_TUNNEL_SKB_CB(skb)->tunnel.ip4 = tunnel; - skb->mark = be32_to_cpu(tunnel->parms.i_key); return xfrm_input(skb, nexthdr, spi, encap_type); } @@ -91,6 +90,8 @@ static int vti_rcv_cb(struct sk_buff *skb, int err) struct pcpu_sw_netstats *tstats; struct xfrm_state *x; struct ip_tunnel *tunnel = XFRM_TUNNEL_SKB_CB(skb)->tunnel.ip4; + u32 orig_mark = skb->mark; + int ret; if (!tunnel) return 1; @@ -107,7 +108,11 @@ static int vti_rcv_cb(struct sk_buff *skb, int err) x = xfrm_input_state(skb); family = x->inner_mode->afinfo->family; - if (!xfrm_policy_check(NULL, XFRM_POLICY_IN, skb, family)) + skb->mark = be32_to_cpu(tunnel->parms.i_key); + ret = xfrm_policy_check(NULL, XFRM_POLICY_IN, skb, family); + skb->mark = orig_mark; + + if (!ret) return -EPERM; skb_scrub_packet(skb, !net_eq(tunnel->net, dev_net(skb->dev))); diff --git a/net/ipv6/ip6_vti.c b/net/ipv6/ip6_vti.c index 104de4da3ff3..ff3bd863fa03 100644 --- a/net/ipv6/ip6_vti.c +++ b/net/ipv6/ip6_vti.c @@ -322,7 +322,6 @@ static int vti6_rcv(struct sk_buff *skb) } XFRM_TUNNEL_SKB_CB(skb)->tunnel.ip6 = t; - skb->mark = be32_to_cpu(t->parms.i_key); rcu_read_unlock(); @@ -342,6 +341,8 @@ static int vti6_rcv_cb(struct sk_buff *skb, int err) struct pcpu_sw_netstats *tstats; struct xfrm_state *x; struct ip6_tnl *t = XFRM_TUNNEL_SKB_CB(skb)->tunnel.ip6; + u32 orig_mark = skb->mark; + int ret; if (!t) return 1; @@ -358,7 +359,11 @@ static int vti6_rcv_cb(struct sk_buff *skb, int err) x = xfrm_input_state(skb); family = x->inner_mode->afinfo->family; - if (!xfrm_policy_check(NULL, XFRM_POLICY_IN, skb, family)) + skb->mark = be32_to_cpu(t->parms.i_key); + ret = xfrm_policy_check(NULL, XFRM_POLICY_IN, skb, family); + skb->mark = orig_mark; + + if (!ret) return -EPERM; skb_scrub_packet(skb, !net_eq(t->net, dev_net(skb->dev)));