From: Herbert Xu Subject: Re: [net-next PATCH RFC 0/3] Preserve skb->mark through VTI tunnels Date: Wed, 27 May 2015 15:55:28 +0800 Message-ID: <20150527075528.GA26671@gondor.apana.org.au> References: <20150526223849.1328.64212.stgit@ahduyck-vm-fedora22> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: steffen.klassert@secunet.com, davem@davemloft.net, netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org To: Alexander Duyck Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20150526223849.1328.64212.stgit@ahduyck-vm-fedora22> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-crypto.vger.kernel.org On Tue, May 26, 2015 at 03:41:10PM -0700, Alexander Duyck wrote: > These patches are meant to try and address the fact the VTI tunnels are > currently overwriting the skb->mark value. I am generally happy with the > first two patches, however the third patch still modifies the skb->mark, > though it undoes after the fact. > > The main problem I am trying to address is the fact that currently if I use > an v6 over v6 VTI tunnel I cannot receive any traffic on the interface as > the skb->mark is bleeding through and causing the traffic to be dropped. Looks good to me. Thanks for following up on this! -- Email: Herbert Xu Home Page: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/ PGP Key: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/pubkey.txt