From: Stephan Mueller Subject: Re: randconfig build error with next-20150529, in crypto/jitterentropy.c Date: Tue, 09 Jun 2015 01:33:12 +0200 Message-ID: <1702795.h60qkgijGA@tauon.atsec.com> References: <2802354.BKbRJQHDPP@tauon.atsec.com> <55762581.6070809@roeck-us.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Cc: Andy Shevchenko , Jim Davis , Stephen Rothwell , linux-next , linux-kernel , Herbert Xu , "David S. Miller" , linux-crypto To: Guenter Roeck Return-path: In-Reply-To: <55762581.6070809@roeck-us.net> Sender: linux-next-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-crypto.vger.kernel.org Am Monday 08 June 2015, 16:30:09 schrieb Guenter Roeck: Hi Guenter, > >get_cycles is implemented as static inline which executes mfspr(SPR_TTCR). >SPR_TTCR is a constant. Normally that information seems to be passed on, >but not when get_cycles() is compiled through jitterentropy. > >Any idea what might cause this ? Then it may be the optimization issue as well that Peter indicated. May I ask you for testing purposes (I do not have an OpenRISC) to remove the following line from crypto/Makefile: CFLAGS_jitterentropy.o = -O0 Note, that should just serve for testing. I will post a patch later that will replace the -O0 statement with a pragma. Thanks a lot. > >Thanks, >Guenter Ciao Stephan