From: Lokesh Vutla Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 6/7] crypto: omap-aes: Add support for GCM mode Date: Fri, 10 Jul 2015 19:39:35 +0530 Message-ID: <559FD21F.2020903@ti.com> References: <1436283109-13318-1-git-send-email-lokeshvutla@ti.com> <1436283109-13318-7-git-send-email-lokeshvutla@ti.com> <20150708041838.GA12744@gondor.apana.org.au> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: , , , , , To: Herbert Xu Return-path: Received: from comal.ext.ti.com ([198.47.26.152]:52427 "EHLO comal.ext.ti.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754846AbbGJOMe (ORCPT ); Fri, 10 Jul 2015 10:12:34 -0400 In-Reply-To: <20150708041838.GA12744@gondor.apana.org.au> Sender: linux-crypto-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Hi Herbert, On Wednesday 08 July 2015 09:48 AM, Herbert Xu wrote: > On Tue, Jul 07, 2015 at 09:01:48PM +0530, Lokesh Vutla wrote: >> >> +static int omap_aes_gcm_copy_buffers(struct omap_aes_dev *dd, >> + struct aead_request *req) [..snip..] >> +static int do_encrypt_iv(struct aead_request *req, u32 *tag) >> +{ >> + struct scatterlist iv_sg; >> + struct ablkcipher_request *ablk_req; >> + struct crypto_ablkcipher *tfm; >> + struct tcrypt_result result; >> + struct omap_aes_ctx *ctx = crypto_aead_ctx(crypto_aead_reqtfm(req)); >> + int ret = 0; >> + >> + tfm = crypto_alloc_ablkcipher("ctr(aes)", 0, 0); > > Ugh, you cannot allocate crypto transforms in the data path. You > should allocate it in init instead. Also using ctr(aes) is overkill. > Just use aes and do the xor by hand. > >> +static int omap_aes_gcm_crypt(struct aead_request *req, unsigned long mode) >> +{ >> + struct omap_aes_ctx *ctx = crypto_aead_ctx(crypto_aead_reqtfm(req)); >> + struct omap_aes_reqctx *rctx = aead_request_ctx(req); >> + struct crypto_aead *aead = crypto_aead_reqtfm(req); >> + unsigned int authlen = crypto_aead_authsize(aead); >> + struct omap_aes_dev *dd; >> + __be32 counter = cpu_to_be32(1); >> + int err; >> + >> + memset(ctx->auth_tag, 0, sizeof(ctx->auth_tag)); > > The ctx is shared memory and you must not write to it as multiple > requests can be called on the same tfm. Use rctx instead. May be a dumb question. If you don't mind can you elaborate more on the usage of rctx and ctx in the driver? Thanks and regards, Lokesh > >> + memcpy(req->iv + 12, &counter, 4); > > The IV is only 12 bytes long so you're corrupting memory here. > You should use rctx here too. > >> + if (req->assoclen + req->cryptlen == 0) { >> + scatterwalk_map_and_copy(ctx->auth_tag, req->dst, 0, authlen, >> + 1); >> + return 0; >> + } > > How can this be right? Did you enable the selftest? > > Cheers, >