From: Maxime Ripard Subject: Re: [PATCH v11] crypto: Add Allwinner Security System crypto accelerator Date: Fri, 24 Jul 2015 10:27:51 +0200 Message-ID: <20150724082751.GC2564@lukather> References: <1437143983-4479-1-git-send-email-clabbe.montjoie@gmail.com> <20150720081050.GB12908@gondor.apana.org.au> <20150720081836.GT28632@lukather> <20150720082057.GA13098@gondor.apana.org.au> <20150721123847.GD2373@lukather> <20150721125014.GA25272@gondor.apana.org.au> Reply-To: maxime.ripard-wi1+55ScJUtKEb57/3fJTNBPR1lH4CV8@public.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="raC6veAxrt5nqIoY" Cc: LABBE Corentin , robh+dt-DgEjT+Ai2ygdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org, pawel.moll-5wv7dgnIgG8@public.gmane.org, mark.rutland-5wv7dgnIgG8@public.gmane.org, ijc+devicetree-KcIKpvwj1kUDXYZnReoRVg@public.gmane.org, galak-sgV2jX0FEOL9JmXXK+q4OQ@public.gmane.org, linux-lFZ/pmaqli7XmaaqVzeoHQ@public.gmane.org, davem-fT/PcQaiUtIeIZ0/mPfg9Q@public.gmane.org, akpm-de/tnXTf+JLsfHDXvbKv3WD2FQJk+8+b@public.gmane.org, gregkh-hQyY1W1yCW8ekmWlsbkhG0B+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org, mchehab-JPH+aEBZ4P+UEJcrhfAQsw@public.gmane.org, arnd-r2nGTMty4D4@public.gmane.org, joe-6d6DIl74uiNBDgjK7y7TUQ@public.gmane.org, devicetree-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, linux-doc-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, linux-arm-kernel-IAPFreCvJWM7uuMidbF8XUB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org, linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, linux-crypto-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, linux-sunxi-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFFw@public.gmane.org To: Herbert Xu Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20150721125014.GA25272-lOAM2aK0SrRLBo1qDEOMRrpzq4S04n8Q@public.gmane.org> List-Post: , List-Help: , List-Archive: , List-Unsubscribe: , List-Id: linux-crypto.vger.kernel.org --raC6veAxrt5nqIoY Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Disposition: inline On Tue, Jul 21, 2015 at 08:50:14PM +0800, Herbert Xu wrote: > On Tue, Jul 21, 2015 at 02:38:47PM +0200, Maxime Ripard wrote: > > I thought you needed at least my Acked-by for that, but > > whatever... How are we supposed to handle subsequent DT patches that > > should be merged through arm-soc then? > > What subsequent patches are you referring to? The changes in > this series are fairly self-contained so it should be unlikely > to cause serious merge conflicts. Enabling it in other boards / SoCs, and/or any change that might conflict with this one. -- Maxime Ripard, Free Electrons Embedded Linux, Kernel and Android engineering http://free-electrons.com --raC6veAxrt5nqIoY--