From: Herbert Xu Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/7] hwrng: Add support for STMicroelectronics' RNG IP Date: Wed, 30 Sep 2015 21:47:57 +0800 Message-ID: <20150930134757.GA18408@gondor.apana.org.au> References: <1442497557-9271-1-git-send-email-lee.jones@linaro.org> <20150918140756.GK9249@gondor.apana.org.au> <20150918151137.GA10763@gondor.apana.org.au> <20150918155112.GE3218@x1> <20150929142932.GY27197@x1> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: "linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , "devicetree@vger.kernel.org" , linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org, Peter Korsgaard , Fabio Estevam , Kieran Bingham , "kernel@stlinux.com" , Linus Torvalds To: Lee Jones Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20150929142932.GY27197@x1> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-crypto.vger.kernel.org On Tue, Sep 29, 2015 at 03:29:32PM +0100, Lee Jones wrote: > > I see that your tree is 8 days old, so this may have been resolved > already, but would you be kind enough to ensure you remove the 6th > (ARM) patch from your repo please? I wouldn't want it to cause > conflicts and for Maxime and yourself to get shouted at by Linus. I prefer not to merge patches that cannot be tested. Without the DT bits in patch 6 the other five patches are useless. So I think patch 6 should be applied together with the other five which add the driver. Of course if Linus wants me to revert patch 6 in case of any potential conflicts with Maxime's tree I'll do that. Linus? Cheers, -- Email: Herbert Xu Home Page: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/ PGP Key: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/pubkey.txt