From: Sandy Harris <sandyinchina@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: ipsec impact on performance
Date: Fri, 4 Dec 2015 00:18:43 -0500
Message-ID: <CACXcFm=RhctbE-+cJNEdBE2DdRuvh7hSwX4Kzwn8UO=SUFxPPw@mail.gmail.com>
References: <20151201175953.GC21252@oracle.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org
To: Sowmini Varadhan <sowmini.varadhan@oracle.com>
Return-path: <linux-crypto-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: from mail-ig0-f170.google.com ([209.85.213.170]:33042 "EHLO
	mail-ig0-f170.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org
	with ESMTP id S1750712AbbLDFSo (ORCPT
	<rfc822;linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org>);
	Fri, 4 Dec 2015 00:18:44 -0500
In-Reply-To: <20151201175953.GC21252@oracle.com>
Sender: linux-crypto-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-crypto.vger.kernel.org>

This article is old (turn of the century) but it may have numbers
worth comparing to
http://www.freeswan.org/freeswan_trees/CURRENT-TREE/doc/performance.html