From: Steffen Klassert Subject: Re: ipsec impact on performance Date: Tue, 8 Dec 2015 12:32:44 +0100 Message-ID: <20151208113244.GK14008@secunet.com> References: <20151201175953.GC21252@oracle.com> <20151202065305.GB14008@secunet.com> <20151202120538.GJ23178@oracle.com> <20151203084508.GD14008@secunet.com> <20151203113820.GX15262@oracle.com> <20151207084050.GH14008@secunet.com> <20151207112748.GB14535@oracle.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Cc: , To: Sowmini Varadhan Return-path: Received: from a.mx.secunet.com ([195.81.216.161]:56156 "EHLO a.mx.secunet.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755401AbbLHLcs (ORCPT ); Tue, 8 Dec 2015 06:32:48 -0500 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20151207112748.GB14535@oracle.com> Sender: linux-crypto-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Mon, Dec 07, 2015 at 06:27:48AM -0500, Sowmini Varadhan wrote: > On (12/07/15 09:40), Steffen Klassert wrote: > > > > I've pushed it to > > > > https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/klassert/linux-stk.git/log/?h=net-next-ipsec-offload > > > > It is just example code, nothing that I would show usually. > > But you asked for it, so here is it :) > > that's fine, I dont expect more at this point, just want to > test-drive it, and see how it compares to my approach. Would be nice if you could share the results. Comments are welcome too, of course.