From: Sowmini Varadhan Subject: Re: ipsec impact on performance Date: Tue, 8 Dec 2015 06:51:15 -0500 Message-ID: <20151208115115.GJ4415@oracle.com> References: <20151201175953.GC21252@oracle.com> <20151202065305.GB14008@secunet.com> <20151202120538.GJ23178@oracle.com> <20151203084508.GD14008@secunet.com> <20151203113820.GX15262@oracle.com> <20151207084050.GH14008@secunet.com> <20151207112748.GB14535@oracle.com> <20151208113244.GK14008@secunet.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org To: Steffen Klassert Return-path: Received: from userp1040.oracle.com ([156.151.31.81]:51293 "EHLO userp1040.oracle.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752347AbbLHLvV (ORCPT ); Tue, 8 Dec 2015 06:51:21 -0500 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20151208113244.GK14008@secunet.com> Sender: linux-crypto-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On (12/08/15 12:32), Steffen Klassert wrote: > > Would be nice if you could share the results. Comments are Sure, not a problem. Give me some time though, I'm also looking into the skb_cow_data and other memory-management issues that were flagged on this thread. I'll have all this info by netdev, at the latest. --Sowmini