From: Russell King - ARM Linux Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC 00/13] Further iMX CAAM updates Date: Wed, 9 Dec 2015 18:21:30 +0000 Message-ID: <20151209182130.GI8644@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> References: <20151207191134.GV8644@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> <5668435B.3020000@freescale.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE Cc: Fabio Estevam , Herbert Xu , "David S. Miller" , linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org To: Horia =?utf-8?Q?Geant=C4=83?= Return-path: Received: from pandora.arm.linux.org.uk ([78.32.30.218]:37823 "EHLO pandora.arm.linux.org.uk" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752897AbbLISVr (ORCPT ); Wed, 9 Dec 2015 13:21:47 -0500 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <5668435B.3020000@freescale.com> Sender: linux-crypto-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Wed, Dec 09, 2015 at 05:06:03PM +0200, Horia Geant=C4=83 wrote: > On 12/7/2015 9:11 PM, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote: > > Here are further imx-caam updates that I've had since before the > > previous merge window. Please review and (I guess) if Freescale > > folk can provide acks etc that would be nice. Thanks. >=20 > Thanks Russell. >=20 > Note that the patch set does not apply cleanly, please rebase on late= st > cryptodev-2.6 tree. I'm afraid I'm not a fan of digging out random git trees, rebasing patches on top of them, and then not being able to test them locally without dragging the entire tree into my own tree. I'd rather wait another kernel cycle instead of polluting my own tree with commits from other trees. --=20 RMK's Patch system: http://www.arm.linux.org.uk/developer/patches/ =46TTC broadband for 0.8mile line: currently at 9.6Mbps down 400kbps up according to speedtest.net.