From: "H. Peter Anvin" Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] random: replace non-blocking pool with a Chacha20-based CRNG Date: Wed, 4 May 2016 13:53:10 -0700 Message-ID: <4289ee97-9868-65b8-46cb-9d354f2d9555@zytor.com> References: <1462170413-7164-1-git-send-email-tytso@mit.edu> <1462170413-7164-2-git-send-email-tytso@mit.edu> <20160504174901.GC3901@thunk.org> <20160504190723.GD3901@thunk.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: tytso@mit.edu, noloader@gmail.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Stephan Mueller , Herbert Xu , andi@firstfloor.org, Sandy Harris , cryptography@lakedaemon.net, jsd@av8n.com, linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org Return-path: Received: from terminus.zytor.com ([198.137.202.10]:57170 "EHLO mail.zytor.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751139AbcEDUxs (ORCPT ); Wed, 4 May 2016 16:53:48 -0400 In-Reply-To: <20160504190723.GD3901@thunk.org> Sender: linux-crypto-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On 05/04/2016 12:07 PM, tytso@thunk.org wrote: > > If we are all agreed that what is in bitops.h is considered valid, > then we can start converting people over to using the version defined > in bitops.h, and if there is some compiler issue we need to work > around, at least we only need to put the workaround in a single header > file. > Yes, please. -hpa