From: Andi Kleen Subject: Re: UB in general ... and linux/bitops.h in particular Date: Thu, 5 May 2016 10:32:14 -0700 Message-ID: <20160505173214.GP13997@two.firstfloor.org> References: <572A6F1C.2080708@av8n.com> <28624BFC-7C63-4F38-9F67-7CBFB0C6499B@zytor.com> <0015E1DE-DFF9-4CCE-805E-7AC286021BED@zytor.com> <20160505035028.GD10776@thunk.org> <572AE9A2.20609@zytor.com> <572B71A7.1020100@av8n.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: "H. Peter Anvin" , noloader@gmail.com, Theodore Ts'o , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Stephan Mueller , Herbert Xu , Andi Kleen , Sandy Harris , cryptography@lakedaemon.net, linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org To: John Denker Return-path: Received: from one.firstfloor.org ([193.170.194.197]:59152 "EHLO one.firstfloor.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750803AbcEERcS (ORCPT ); Thu, 5 May 2016 13:32:18 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <572B71A7.1020100@av8n.com> Sender: linux-crypto-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: > Suggestions: > > a) Going forward, I suggest that UB should not be invoked > unless there is a good solid reason. Good luck rewriting most of the kernel source. This discussion is insane! -Andi