From: Tadeusz Struk Subject: Re: Typos and RSA Date: Wed, 18 May 2016 09:01:41 -0700 Message-ID: <8f3a5cfc-9132-0c01-f6ca-93c92eb4025c@intel.com> References: <573B8BA3.8020902@amd.com> <573B9F54.7050006@amd.com> <6203568.4quGhfsc99@positron.chronox.de> <573C90E6.8000203@amd.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org To: Gary R Hook , Stephan Mueller Return-path: Received: from mga02.intel.com ([134.134.136.20]:25374 "EHLO mga02.intel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751442AbcERQD1 (ORCPT ); Wed, 18 May 2016 12:03:27 -0400 In-Reply-To: <573C90E6.8000203@amd.com> Sender: linux-crypto-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On 05/18/2016 08:57 AM, Gary R Hook wrote: > Yes, thank you. After spending more time wandering through rsa.c & rsa_helper.c > I have come to realize that I have been laboring under a paradigm imposed by > my implementation requirements. Now that I have that cleared up, the answer to > my question it self-evident.Although I'm still not clear on why testmgr feels > the need to create a SGL table with an empty second element (for the existing > tests), rather than a single SGL. Because the role of testmgr is to test different scenarios like more than one entry in an sgl, etc. Thanks, -- TS