From: Tudor-Dan Ambarus Subject: RE: [PATCH v6 0/3] crypto: caam - add support for RSA algorithm Date: Mon, 23 May 2016 12:56:18 +0000 Message-ID: References: <1463660118-19188-1-git-send-email-tudor-dan.ambarus@nxp.com> <2370625.CgO9A4qjJ6@positron.chronox.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT Cc: "herbert@gondor.apana.org.au" , "linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org" , "Horia Ioan Geanta Neag" To: Stephan Mueller Return-path: Received: from mail-db3on0096.outbound.protection.outlook.com ([157.55.234.96]:4752 "EHLO emea01-db3-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752692AbcEWN3g convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Mon, 23 May 2016 09:29:36 -0400 In-Reply-To: <2370625.CgO9A4qjJ6@positron.chronox.de> Content-Language: en-US Sender: linux-crypto-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Hi Stephan, > as I am looking into the RSA countermeasures, I am wondering how much of > countermeasures are actually applied inside hardware implementations. Please point me to the reference RSA countermeasures so that we have a common point of start. Thanks, ta