From: "Austin S. Hemmelgarn" Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 0/5] /dev/random - a new approach Date: Tue, 21 Jun 2016 13:17:41 -0400 Message-ID: References: <1466007463.20087.11.camel@redhat.com> <3381856.qSaz1KcX2Z@positron.chronox.de> <8999970.pstTbGZv5G@positron.chronox.de> <6b8c8f6a-862a-3e7c-e950-75cd93cdc1f7@gmail.com> <20160621134240.GA8086@amd> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Stephan Mueller , Theodore Ts'o , =?UTF-8?Q?David_Ja=c5=a1a?= , Andi Kleen , sandyinchina@gmail.com, Jason Cooper , John Denker , "H. Peter Anvin" , Joe Perches , George Spelvin , linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org To: Pavel Machek Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20160621134240.GA8086@amd> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-crypto.vger.kernel.org On 2016-06-21 09:42, Pavel Machek wrote: > Hi! > >> 6. You have a significant lack of data regarding embedded systems, which is >> one of the two biggest segments of Linux's market share. You list no >> results for any pre-ARMv6 systems (Linux still runs on and is regularly used >> on ARMv4 CPU's, and it's worth also pointing out that the values on >> the > > Feel free to contribute more test results. > > I mean... you can't expect every person who wants to improve something > in linux to test on everything in the world... can you? > I was commenting less on the lack of results for such systems than on attempts to make statements about such systems based on a data-set that lacks information about such systems.