From: Mark Rutland Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] crypto: brcm: DT documentation for Broadcom SPU driver Date: Tue, 6 Dec 2016 14:06:07 +0000 Message-ID: <20161206140607.GB24177@leverpostej> References: <1480536453-24781-1-git-send-email-rob.rice@broadcom.com> <1480536453-24781-2-git-send-email-rob.rice@broadcom.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: Herbert Xu , "David S. Miller" , Rob Herring , linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Ray Jui , Scott Branden , Jon Mason , bcm-kernel-feedback-list@broadcom.com, Catalin Marinas , Will Deacon , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, Steve Lin To: Rob Rice Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1480536453-24781-2-git-send-email-rob.rice@broadcom.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-crypto.vger.kernel.org On Wed, Nov 30, 2016 at 03:07:31PM -0500, Rob Rice wrote: > Device tree documentation for Broadcom Secure Processing Unit > (SPU) crypto driver. > > Signed-off-by: Steve Lin > Signed-off-by: Rob Rice > --- > .../devicetree/bindings/crypto/brcm,spu-crypto.txt | 25 ++++++++++++++++++++++ > 1 file changed, 25 insertions(+) > create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/crypto/brcm,spu-crypto.txt > > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/crypto/brcm,spu-crypto.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/crypto/brcm,spu-crypto.txt > new file mode 100644 > index 0000000..e5fe942 > --- /dev/null > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/crypto/brcm,spu-crypto.txt > @@ -0,0 +1,25 @@ > +The Broadcom Secure Processing Unit (SPU) driver supports symmetric > +cryptographic offload for Broadcom SoCs with SPU hardware. A SoC may have > +multiple SPU hardware blocks. Bindings shound describe *hardware*, not *drivers*. Please drop mention of the driver, and just decribe the hardware. > +Required properties: > +- compatible : Should be "brcm,spum-crypto" for devices with SPU-M hardware > + (e.g., Northstar2) or "brcm,spum-nsp-crypto" for the Northstar Plus variant > + of the SPU-M hardware. > + > +- reg: Should contain SPU registers location and length. > +- mboxes: A list of mailbox channels to be used by the kernel driver. Mailbox > +channels correspond to DMA rings on the device. > + > +Example: > + spu-crypto@612d0000 { > + compatible = "brcm,spum-crypto"; > + reg = <0 0x612d0000 0 0x900>, /* SPU 0 control regs */ > + <0 0x612f0000 0 0x900>, /* SPU 1 control regs */ > + <0 0x61310000 0 0x900>, /* SPU 2 control regs */ > + <0 0x61330000 0 0x900>; /* SPU 3 control regs */ The above didn't mention there were several register sets, and the comment beside each makes them sound like they're separate SPU instances, so I don't think it makes sense to group them as one node. What's going on here? > + mboxes = <&pdc0 0>, > + <&pdc1 0>, > + <&pdc2 0>, > + <&pdc3 0>; Does each mbox correspond to one of the SPUs above? Or is there a shared pool? Thanks, Mark.