From: abed mohammad kamaluddin Subject: Re: algif for compression? Date: Fri, 16 Dec 2016 19:41:23 +0530 Message-ID: References: <20161210081014.GA32746@gondor.apana.org.au> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Cc: linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org To: Herbert Xu Return-path: Received: from mail-wm0-f54.google.com ([74.125.82.54]:34869 "EHLO mail-wm0-f54.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755619AbcLPOUn (ORCPT ); Fri, 16 Dec 2016 09:20:43 -0500 Received: by mail-wm0-f54.google.com with SMTP id a197so35161915wmd.0 for ; Fri, 16 Dec 2016 06:20:42 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <20161210081014.GA32746@gondor.apana.org.au> Sender: linux-crypto-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: > > The compression interface is currently in a state of flux. We > should make it settle down first before exporting it to user-space. > > For a start it would be good to actually switch IPsec/IPcomp over > to the new compression interface. Thanks Herbert. Are there timelines or ongoing efforts for moving IPcomp/Ipsec to use acomp? Or any proposals that have been or need to be taken up in this regard. Thanks, Abed