From: Sasha Levin Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 1/3] crypto: zip - Add ThunderX ZIP driver core Date: Mon, 19 Dec 2016 11:12:21 -0500 Message-ID: References: <20161212150439.18627-1-jglauber@cavium.com> <20161212150439.18627-2-jglauber@cavium.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Cc: Herbert Xu , linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org, "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List" , "David S . Miller" , Mahipal Challa , Vishnu Nair To: Jan Glauber , alexander.levin@verizon.com Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20161212150439.18627-2-jglauber@cavium.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-crypto.vger.kernel.org On Mon, Dec 12, 2016 at 10:04 AM, Jan Glauber wrote: > +/* error messages */ > +#define zip_err(fmt, args...) pr_err("ZIP ERR:%s():%d: " \ > + fmt "\n", __func__, __LINE__, ## args) > + > +#ifdef MSG_ENABLE > +/* Enable all messages */ > +#define zip_msg(fmt, args...) pr_info("ZIP_MSG:" fmt "\n", ## args) > +#else > +#define zip_msg(fmt, args...) > +#endif > + > +#if defined(ZIP_DEBUG_ENABLE) && defined(MSG_ENABLE) > + > +#ifdef DEBUG_LEVEL > + > +#define FILE_NAME (strrchr(__FILE__, '/') ? strrchr(__FILE__, '/') + 1 : \ > + strrchr(__FILE__, '\\') ? strrchr(__FILE__, '\\') + 1 : __FILE__) > + > +#if DEBUG_LEVEL >= 4 > + > +#define zip_dbg(fmt, args...) pr_info("ZIP DBG: %s: %s() : %d: " \ > + fmt "\n", FILE_NAME, __func__, __LINE__, ## args) > + > +#define zip_dbg_enter(fmt, args...) pr_info("ZIP_DBG: %s() in %s" \ > + fmt "\n", __func__, FILE_NAME, ## args) > + > +#define zip_dbg_exit(fmt, args...) pr_info("ZIP_DBG:Exit %s() in %s" \ > + fmt "\n", __func__, FILE_NAME, ## args) > + > +#elif DEBUG_LEVEL >= 3 > + > +#define zip_dbg(fmt, args...) pr_info("ZIP DBG: %s: %s() : %d: " \ > + fmt "\n", FILE_NAME, __func__, __LINE__, ## args) > + > +#elif DEBUG_LEVEL >= 2 > + > +#define zip_dbg(fmt, args...) pr_info("ZIP DBG: %s() : %d: " \ > + fmt "\n", __func__, __LINE__, ## args) > + > +#else > + > +#define zip_dbg(fmt, args...) pr_info("ZIP DBG:" fmt "\n", ## args) > + > +#endif /* DEBUG LEVEL >= */ > + > +#if DEBUG_LEVEL <= 3 > + > +#define zip_dbg_enter(fmt, args...) > +#define zip_dbg_exit(fmt, args...) > + > +#endif /* DEBUG_LEVEL <= 3 */ > +#else > + > +#define zip_dbg(fmt, args...) pr_info("ZIP DBG:" fmt "\n", ## args) > + > +#define zip_dbg_enter(fmt, args...) > +#define zip_dbg_exit(fmt, args...) > + > +#endif /* DEBUG_LEVEL */ > +#else > + > +#define zip_dbg(fmt, args...) > +#define zip_dbg_enter(fmt, args...) > +#define zip_dbg_exit(fmt, args...) > + > +#endif /* ZIP_DEBUG_ENABLE */ The whole zip_dbg_[enter,exit] thing can be just done with tracepoints instead of reinventing the wheel. No reason to carry that code > +u32 zip_load_instr(union zip_inst_s *instr, > + struct zip_device *zip_dev) > +{ > + union zip_quex_doorbell dbell; > + u32 queue = 0; > + u32 consumed = 0; > + u64 *ncb_ptr = NULL; > + union zip_nptr_s ncp; > + > + /* > + * Distribute the instructions between the enabled queues based on > + * the CPU id. > + */ > + if (raw_smp_processor_id() % 2 == 0) > + queue = 0; > + else > + queue = 1; Is this just simplistic load balancing scheme? There's no guarantee that the cpu won't change later on. > + > + /* Poll for the IQ cmd completion code */ > + zip_dbg_exit(); The comment doesn't match with what actually happens? > +static inline u64 zip_depth(void) > +{ > + struct zip_device *zip_dev = zip_get_device(zip_get_node_id()); > + > + if (!zip_dev) > + return -ENODEV; > + > + return zip_dev->depth; > +} > + > +static inline u64 zip_onfsize(void) > +{ > + struct zip_device *zip_dev = zip_get_device(zip_get_node_id()); > + > + if (!zip_dev) > + return -ENODEV; > + > + return zip_dev->onfsize; > +} > + > +static inline u64 zip_ctxsize(void) > +{ > + struct zip_device *zip_dev = zip_get_device(zip_get_node_id()); > + > + if (!zip_dev) > + return -ENODEV; > + > + return zip_dev->ctxsize; > +} Where is it all used? > +/* > + * Allocates new ZIP device structure > + * Returns zip_device pointer or NULL if cannot allocate memory for zip_device > + */ > +static struct zip_device *zip_alloc_device(struct pci_dev *pdev) > +{ > + struct zip_device *zip = NULL; > + int idx = 0; > + > + for (idx = 0; idx < MAX_ZIP_DEVICES; idx++) { > + if (!zip_dev[idx]) > + break; > + } > + > + zip = kzalloc(sizeof(*zip), GFP_KERNEL); > + > + if (!zip) > + return NULL; > + > + zip_dev[idx] = zip; If for some odd reason we try to allocate more than MAX_ZIP_DEVICES this will deref an invalid pointer. > +/** > + * zip_get_device - Get ZIP device based on node id of cpu > + * > + * @node: Node id of the current cpu > + * Return: Pointer to Zip device structure > + */ > +struct zip_device *zip_get_device(int node) > +{ > + if ((node < MAX_ZIP_DEVICES) && (node >= 0)) > + return zip_dev[node]; > + > + zip_err("ZIP device not found for node id %d\n", node); > + return NULL; > +} > + > +/** > + * zip_get_node_id - Get the node id of the current cpu > + * > + * Return: Node id of the current cpu > + */ > +int zip_get_node_id(void) > +{ > + return cpu_to_node(raw_smp_processor_id()); > +} This looks off: why are you calling raw_smp_processor_id() instead of just smp_processor_id()? I guess you saw warnings from smp_processor_id(), but they happen to warn you that the cpu might change under you, making this node number incorrect. > +#ifndef __ZIP_MAIN_H__ > +#define __ZIP_MAIN_H__ > + > +#include "zip_device.h" > +#include "zip_regs.h" > + > +/* PCI device IDs */ > +#define PCI_DEVICE_ID_THUNDERX_ZIP 0xA01A > + > +/* ZIP device BARs */ > +#define PCI_CFG_ZIP_PF_BAR0 0 /* Base addr for normal regs */ > +#define PCI_CFG_ZIP_PF_BAR4 4 /* Base addr for MSI-X regs */ > + > +/* Maximum available zip queues */ > +#define ZIP_MAX_NUM_QUEUES 8 > +#define ZIP_MAXQ_PER_ZIPENG 4 > +#define ZIP_NUMENG_CN88XX 2 > + > +#define ZIP_128B_ALIGN 7 > + > +/* Buffer size and alignment */ > +#define ZIP_CMD_QBUF_SIZE (8064 + 8) > +#define ZIP_CMD_QBUF_ALIGN 128 > +#define ZIP_DATA_BUF_ALIGN 8 > > +/* > + * There will be max of 2^20 zip cmds in the zip instruction queue. > + * So no of zip Chunk buffers = ((2^20) / ((2*1024)/64)) > + */ > +#define ZIP_MAX_CMD (1024 * 1024) > +#define ZIP_CMD_PER_BUF (ZIP_CMD_QBUF_SIZE / 64) > +#define ZIP_CMD_QBUF_MAX_CNT (1 * 1024) > + > +/* Data buffer size 64K for time being */ > +#define ZIP_DATA_BUF_SIZE (64 * 1024) > + > +/* Number of data buffers */ > +#define ZIP_DATA_BUF_CNT (32 * 1024) Bunch of these defines aren't used. > +/** > + * zip_cmd_qbuf_alloc - Allocates a cmd buffer for ZIP Instruction Queue > + * @zip: Pointer to zip device structure > + * @q: Queue number to allocate bufffer to > + * Return: 0 if successful, -ENOMEM otherwise > + */ > +int zip_cmd_qbuf_alloc(struct zip_device *zip, int q) > +{ > + zip_dbg_enter(); > + > + zip->iq[q].sw_head = (u64 *)__get_free_pages((GFP_KERNEL | GFP_DMA), > + get_order(ZIP_CMD_QBUF_SIZE)); > + > + if (!zip->iq[q].sw_head) > + return -ENOMEM; > + > + memset(zip->iq[q].sw_head, 0, ZIP_CMD_QBUF_SIZE); > + > + zip_dbg("cmd_qbuf_alloc[%d] Success : %p\n", q, zip->iq[q].sw_head); > + zip_dbg_exit(); > + return 0; > +} > + > +/** > + * zip_cmd_qbuf_free - Frees the cmd Queue buffer > + * @zip: Pointer to zip device structure > + * @q: Queue number to free buffer of > + */ > +void zip_cmd_qbuf_free(struct zip_device *zip, int q) > +{ > + zip_dbg("Freeing cmd_qbuf 0x%lx\n", zip->iq[q].sw_tail); > + > + free_pages((u64)zip->iq[q].sw_tail, get_order(ZIP_CMD_QBUF_SIZE)); > +} Why are you going through __get_free_pages() for constant size allocations? kmemcache would be better here. > +/** > + * zip_data_buf_alloc - Allocates memory for a data bufffer > + * @size: Size of the buffer to allocate > + * Returns: Pointer to the buffer allocated > + */ > +u8 *zip_data_buf_alloc(u64 size) > +{ > + u8 *ptr; > + > + zip_dbg_enter(); > + > + ptr = (u8 *)__get_free_pages((GFP_ATOMIC | GFP_DMA), > + get_order(size)); > + > + if (!ptr) > + return NULL; > + > + memset(ptr, 0, size); > + > + zip_dbg("Data buffer allocation success\n"); > + zip_dbg_exit(); > + return ptr; > +} > + > +/** > + * zip_data_buf_free - Frees the memory of a data buffer > + * @ptr: Pointer to the buffer > + * @size: Buffer size > + */ > +void zip_data_buf_free(u8 *ptr, u64 size) > +{ > + zip_dbg("Freeing data buffer 0x%lx\n", ptr); > + > + free_pages((u64)ptr, get_order(size)); > +} Same question here; you end up allocating constant sizes - why not kmemcache? Also, this is quite a lot to allocate out of the atomic pool, is there a reason for that? Thanks, Sasha