From: Hannes Frederic Sowa Subject: Re: [kernel-hardening] Re: [PATCH v7 3/6] random: use SipHash in place of MD5 Date: Thu, 22 Dec 2016 16:05:53 +0100 Message-ID: <5c306c80-3499-8b92-21d0-c197f30ce326@stressinduktion.org> References: <20161216030328.11602-1-Jason@zx2c4.com> <20161221230216.25341-1-Jason@zx2c4.com> <20161221230216.25341-4-Jason@zx2c4.com> <17bd0c70-d2c1-165b-f5b2-252dfca404e8@stressinduktion.org> <20161222054125.lzxhd6ctovm3wk4p@thunk.org> <1482410840.2472.2.camel@stressinduktion.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Theodore Ts'o , Andy Lutomirski , Netdev , LKML , Linux Crypto Mailing List , David Laight , Eric Dumazet , Linus Torvalds , Eric Biggers , Tom Herbert , Andi Kleen , "David S. Miller" , Jean-Philippe Aumasson To: "Jason A. Donenfeld" , kernel-hardening@lists.openwall.com Return-path: In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-crypto.vger.kernel.org On 22.12.2016 14:10, Jason A. Donenfeld wrote: > On Thu, Dec 22, 2016 at 1:47 PM, Hannes Frederic Sowa > wrote: >> following up on what appears to be a random subject: ;) >> >> IIRC, ext4 code by default still uses half_md4 for hashing of filenames >> in the htree. siphash seems to fit this use case pretty good. > > I saw this too. I'll try to address it in v8 of this series. This change would need a new version of the ext4 super block, because you should not change existing file systems.