From: =?iso-8859-2?Q?Horia_Geant=E3?= Subject: Re: [RFC 0/7] crypto: caam - add Queue Interface (QI) support Date: Thu, 16 Mar 2017 14:13:52 +0000 Message-ID: References: <1488552733-20806-1-git-send-email-horia.geanta@nxp.com> <20170316084249.GB11653@gondor.apana.org.au> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-2" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: "linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org" , Claudiu Manoil , Cristian Stoica , Dan Douglass , "linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org" , Vakul Garg , Alexandru Porosanu To: Herbert Xu , Scott Wood , Roy Pledge Return-path: Content-Language: en-US List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=m.gmane.org@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-crypto.vger.kernel.org On 3/16/2017 10:43 AM, Herbert Xu wrote: > On Fri, Mar 03, 2017 at 04:52:06PM +0200, Horia Geant=E3 wrote: >> The patchset adds support for CAAM Queue Interface (QI), the additional >> interface (besides job ring) available for submitting jobs to the engine >> on platforms having DPAA (Datapath Acceleration Architecture). >> >> Patches 1-4 are QMan dependencies. >> I would prefer to take them through the crypto tree, >> but I am open to suggestions. >> >> Patch 5 adds a missing double inclusion guard in desc_constr.h. >> >> Patch 6 adds the caam/qi job submission backend. >> >> Patch 7 adds algorithms (ablkcipher and authenc) that run on top >> of caam/qi. For now, their priority is set lower than caam/jr. > = > I'm fine with the crypto bits. > = Herbert, Thanks for the review. Should I submit formally, i.e. without the [RFC] prefix? Scott, Roy, Do you have any comments wrt. soc/qman patches or with them going through the crypto tree? Thanks, Horia