From: Steffen Klassert Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/4] crypto: CRYPTO_MAX_ALG_NAME is too low Date: Thu, 6 Apr 2017 23:14:31 +0200 Message-ID: <20170406211431.GD12763@secunet.com> References: <367298c5-aa5d-3708-72d0-8a44702d0caa@nokia.com> <20170406081509.GB30557@gondor.apana.org.au> <20170406.135832.1914702009261438916.davem@davemloft.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Cc: , , , To: David Miller Return-path: Received: from a.mx.secunet.com ([62.96.220.36]:41436 "EHLO a.mx.secunet.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751020AbdDFVOf (ORCPT ); Thu, 6 Apr 2017 17:14:35 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20170406.135832.1914702009261438916.davem@davemloft.net> Sender: linux-crypto-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Thu, Apr 06, 2017 at 01:58:32PM -0700, David Miller wrote: > From: Herbert Xu > Date: Thu, 6 Apr 2017 16:15:09 +0800 > > > As the final patch depends on all three it would be easiest if > > we pushed the xfrm patch through the crypto tree. Steffen/David? > > No objections from me for this going through the crypto tree. I have no objections too.