From: Krzysztof Kozlowski Subject: Re: [PATCH] crypto: exynoes-rng: Set cra_ctxsize to 0 Date: Mon, 22 May 2017 07:56:09 +0200 Message-ID: References: <20170521060952.19055-1-prasannatsmkumar@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Cc: Herbert Xu , linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org To: PrasannaKumar Muralidharan Return-path: Received: from mail.kernel.org ([198.145.29.99]:49952 "EHLO mail.kernel.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751261AbdEVF4L (ORCPT ); Mon, 22 May 2017 01:56:11 -0400 Received: from mail-it0-f52.google.com (mail-it0-f52.google.com [209.85.214.52]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id E639B239D5 for ; Mon, 22 May 2017 05:56:10 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-it0-f52.google.com with SMTP id g126so73541002ith.0 for ; Sun, 21 May 2017 22:56:10 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-crypto-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Mon, May 22, 2017 at 5:44 AM, PrasannaKumar Muralidharan wrote: >>> I do not have access to the hardware, did not test the change. Sorry I >>> forgot to mention that. >> >> That is quite important... By default everything must be tested so if >> you are skipping this step then please mark the patch respectively so >> others will provide testing. > > Sure. Will keep that in mind. Instead of marking it as a [PATCH] > should I use something else for this? Will it make things easier? If sending untested patch is really necessary, then mark it either as RFT instead of PATCH or add a comment about it after --- separator. Best regards, Krzysztof