From: Herbert Xu Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/6] fscrypt: use HKDF-SHA512 to derive the per-inode encryption keys Date: Fri, 14 Jul 2017 00:07:54 +0800 Message-ID: <20170713160753.GA25989@gondor.apana.org.au> References: <20170712210035.51534-1-ebiggers3@gmail.com> <20170712210035.51534-4-ebiggers3@gmail.com> <2034167.Brpu2WxA6s@tauon.chronox.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Cc: Eric Biggers , linux-fscrypt@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org, linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net, linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org, linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org, "Theodore Y . Ts'o" , Jaegeuk Kim , Alex Cope , Eric Biggers To: Stephan =?iso-8859-1?Q?M=FCller?= Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <2034167.Brpu2WxA6s@tauon.chronox.de> Sender: linux-fsdevel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-crypto.vger.kernel.org On Thu, Jul 13, 2017 at 04:54:55PM +0200, Stephan M?ller wrote: > Am Mittwoch, 12. Juli 2017, 23:00:32 CEST schrieb Eric Biggers: > > Hi Herbert, > > This patch adds a second KDF to the kernel -- the first is found in the keys > subsystem. > > The next KDF that may come in is in the TLS scope. > > Would it make sense to warm up the KDF patches adding generic KDF support to > the kernel crypto API that I supplied some time ago? The advantages would be > to have one location of KDF implementations and the benefit of the testmgr. Sure. Though I'd like to see what it looks like before I commit :) Thanks, -- Email: Herbert Xu Home Page: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/ PGP Key: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/pubkey.txt