From: Arnd Bergmann Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v12 3/4] Linux Random Number Generator Date: Fri, 21 Jul 2017 17:09:11 +0200 Message-ID: References: <3910055.ntkqcq1Chb@positron.chronox.de> <5238256.jqB5BlnSCf@positron.chronox.de> <20170721030846.m2r3ix4s2modahsw@thunk.org> <2787001.lEj6P09Sfm@tauon.chronox.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: "Theodore Ts'o" , Greg Kroah-Hartman , "Jason A. Donenfeld" , linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org, Linux Kernel Mailing List To: =?UTF-8?Q?Stephan_M=C3=BCller?= Return-path: In-Reply-To: <2787001.lEj6P09Sfm@tauon.chronox.de> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-crypto.vger.kernel.org On Fri, Jul 21, 2017 at 10:57 AM, Stephan M=C3=BCller = wrote: > Am Freitag, 21. Juli 2017, 05:08:47 CEST schrieb Theodore Ts'o: >> Um, the timer is the largest number of interrupts on my system. Compare= : >> >> CPU0 CPU1 CPU2 CPU3 >> LOC: 6396552 6038865 6558646 6057102 Local timer interrup= ts >> >> with the number of disk related interrupts: >> >> 120: 21492 139284 40513 1705886 PCI-MSI 376832-edge >> ahci[0000:00:17.0] > > They seem to be not picked up with the add_interrupt_randomness function. On x86, the local APIC timer has some special handling in arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S that does not go through handle_irq_event(). I would assume that this is different when you boot with the "noapictimer" option and use the hpet clockevent instead. On other architectures, the timer interrupt is often handled as a regular IRQ as well. Arnd