From: PrasannaKumar Muralidharan Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/4] Rearrange functions to remove forward declarations Date: Thu, 26 Oct 2017 22:33:40 +0530 Message-ID: References: <20171026153427.22334-1-prasannatsmkumar@gmail.com> <823fc44a-8ccc-1f8d-51f5-a4411362ffbc@caviumnetworks.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Cc: Herbert Xu , Harald Freudenberger , david.daney@cavium.com, Corentin LABBE , "open list:HARDWARE RANDOM NUMBER GENERATOR CORE" , Matt Mackall To: David Daney Return-path: Received: from mail-io0-f194.google.com ([209.85.223.194]:48609 "EHLO mail-io0-f194.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932137AbdJZRDl (ORCPT ); Thu, 26 Oct 2017 13:03:41 -0400 Received: by mail-io0-f194.google.com with SMTP id j17so6887618iod.5 for ; Thu, 26 Oct 2017 10:03:40 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <823fc44a-8ccc-1f8d-51f5-a4411362ffbc@caviumnetworks.com> Sender: linux-crypto-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Hi David, On 26 October 2017 at 22:18, David Daney wrote: > On 10/26/2017 08:34 AM, PrasannaKumar Muralidharan wrote: >> >> This patch series rearranges functions such that forward declarations >> becomes unnecessary. Remove those forward declaration. > > > Why? > > The code churn and increase in difficulty of attribution are big drawbacks > to this sort of patch set. Completely agreed. I did understand there is little value in this change. Wasn't sure whether such a patch is encouraged so gave a try. I am fine with not taking the patch. Regards, PrasannaKumar