From: Brijesh Singh Subject: Re: [Part2 PATCH v6 00/38] x86: Secure Encrypted Virtualization (AMD) Date: Thu, 2 Nov 2017 15:18:59 -0500 Message-ID: <14a4e716-2a74-d6ef-bf43-6794f29db1c8@amd.com> References: <20171020023413.122280-1-brijesh.singh@amd.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: brijesh.singh@amd.com, kvm list , linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org, Borislav Petkov , "Lendacky, Thomas" , Gary Hook To: Herbert Xu , Paolo Bonzini Return-path: Received: from mail-sn1nam01on0041.outbound.protection.outlook.com ([104.47.32.41]:62000 "EHLO NAM01-SN1-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S934221AbdKBUTI (ORCPT ); Thu, 2 Nov 2017 16:19:08 -0400 In-Reply-To: Content-Language: en-US Sender: linux-crypto-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Hi Herbert, On 10/24/2017 07:14 AM, Brijesh Singh wrote: > Hi Herbert and Paolo, > > .... > > Since the PSP patches touches both the CCP and KVM driver, hence I was > wondering if you guys have any thought on how PSP patches will be > merged? I am talking about Patch 9 to 20 from this series. I have > ensured that patches apply cleanly on both kvm/master and > cryptodev-2.6/master. We can do this in one of two ways: > > - Paolo can merge the PSP support through the KVM branch > > or > > - Herbert can create a topic branch with PSP changes and Paolo can use > that topic branch. > > Any visibility will help my next submission. thank you. > Just checking, any thought on this? Are you okay if the PSP changes are merged through the KVM tree? -Brijesh