From: PrasannaKumar Muralidharan Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] tpm: Move Linux RNG connection to hwrng Date: Tue, 7 Nov 2017 08:50:44 +0530 Message-ID: References: <20171031200503.GC18578@ziepe.ca> <20171105110506.usxmuzrvcjvxahr6@linux.intel.com> <20171106022704.GD26011@ziepe.ca> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Cc: Jarkko Sakkinen , Stefan Berger , linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org, David Howells , Herbert Xu , Dmitry Kasatkin , open list , "open list:INTEGRITY MEASUREMENT ARCHITECTURE (IMA)" , "open list:KEYS-TRUSTED" , "open list:HARDWARE RANDOM NUMBER GENERATOR CORE" , James Morris , Matt Mackall , David Safford , Mimi Zohar , "Serge E. Hallyn" To: Jason Gunthorpe Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20171106022704.GD26011@ziepe.ca> Sender: owner-linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-crypto.vger.kernel.org Hi Jason, On 6 November 2017 at 07:57, Jason Gunthorpe wrote: > On Sun, Nov 05, 2017 at 01:05:06PM +0200, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote: > >> I asked to create a series for a reason. Now this doesn't apply because I >> don't have an ancestor in my git history. > > It would be unusual for me to put your patch into a series unless I am > also adopting it. eg what happens if there are more comments on it? > > Also, I wasn't sure what branch your patch was against since my tree > didn't have history for it either.. > > Sometimes the maintainer has to sort stuff like this out... :) > >> Please resend as series together with my patch. I can apply neither yet >> because they have zero tested-by's. > > Hopefully PrasannaKumar can test both patches. I am assuming you are talking about the following patches - using struct tpm_chip instead of chip number and this patch. I won't be able to test if struct tpm_chip usage as I don't have multiple tpm hw in one machine. In case of tpm rng changes I can test only the lifecycle of tpm rng device. Is that enough? I feel my test will be limited. Please provide your thoughts on this. Regards, PrasannaKumar