From: Jarkko Sakkinen Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] tpm: Move Linux RNG connection to hwrng Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2018 17:28:08 +0200 Message-ID: <20180130152808.2egxs2ki657eyxe3@linux.intel.com> References: <20171105110506.usxmuzrvcjvxahr6@linux.intel.com> <20171106022704.GD26011@ziepe.ca> <20171107160404.GG21466@ziepe.ca> <20171114143421.3jxn6fzvgp2xmyk6@linux.intel.com> <20171117132853.cmr3wmsc3biedv7p@linux.intel.com> <20171117135758.wvx3w5phndvfmfsh@linux.intel.com> <20180129220612.ifk7r4md5tynlvz4@linux.intel.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: PrasannaKumar Muralidharan , Jason Gunthorpe , Stefan Berger , linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org, David Howells , Herbert Xu , Dmitry Kasatkin , open list , "open list:INTEGRITY MEASUREMENT ARCHITECTURE (IMA)" , "open list:KEYS-TRUSTED" , "open list:HARDWARE RANDOM NUMBER GENERATOR CORE" , James Morris , Matt Mackall , David Safford , Mimi Zohar , "Serge E. Hallyn" To: James Morris Return-path: Received: from mga03.intel.com ([134.134.136.65]:8255 "EHLO mga03.intel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752933AbeA3P2R (ORCPT ); Tue, 30 Jan 2018 10:28:17 -0500 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-crypto-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Tue, Jan 30, 2018 at 10:52:13PM +1100, James Morris wrote: > On Tue, 30 Jan 2018, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote: > > > On Sat, Jan 27, 2018 at 12:20:18PM +0530, PrasannaKumar Muralidharan wrote: > > > Hi Jarkko, > > > > > > On 17 November 2017 at 19:27, Jarkko Sakkinen > > > wrote: > > > > On Fri, Nov 17, 2017 at 03:28:53PM +0200, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote: > > > > > > > > At least signed-off-by from PrassanaKumar is missing from the 2nd > > > > commit. I'll add it. > > > > > > I had the impression that my signed-off-by will be present in this > > > change. But it is missing in [1]. Is it supposed to be that way? > > > > > > 1. https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/next/linux-next.git/commit/?id=6e592a065d51d26f9d62b8b7501a5114076af8b4 > > > > > > Thanks, > > > PrasannaKumar > > > > Yes, it would be senseful. > > > > James, would it still be possible to amend this tag to security tree? > > Nope, it's been pushed to Linus. Damn. Well, good that Tested-by is there. I'm sorry about this. /Jarkko