From: Stephan Mueller Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 2/3] crypto: hisilicon hacv1 driver Date: Mon, 05 Feb 2018 15:10:59 +0100 Message-ID: <25300210.7qS7PduyPT@tauon.chronox.de> References: <20180130152953.14068-1-jonathan.cameron@huawei.com> <7706135.m10557lhAe@positron.chronox.de> <20180205140203.00007e46@huawei.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Cc: linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org, linuxarm@huawei.com, xuzaibo@huawei.com, Herbert Xu , "David S . Miller" , devicetree@vger.kernel.org, Mark Brown , Xiongfeng Wang To: Jonathan Cameron Return-path: Received: from mail.eperm.de ([89.247.134.16]:59310 "EHLO mail.eperm.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752607AbeBEOLC (ORCPT ); Mon, 5 Feb 2018 09:11:02 -0500 In-Reply-To: <20180205140203.00007e46@huawei.com> Sender: linux-crypto-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Am Montag, 5. Februar 2018, 15:02:03 CET schrieb Jonathan Cameron: Hi Jonathan, > I could drop this for the initial submission and bring it in as an > optimization with supporting numbers as a follow up patch. I am not disputing the code itself. It just occurred to me that the code is similar to the fixed code which did not handle an SGL with a leading SG entry having no associated page. Thus, I thought I ask :-) Ciao Stephan