From: Thiago Jung Bauermann Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 00/12] Appended signatures support for IMA appraisal Date: Fri, 16 Mar 2018 18:38:38 -0300 Message-ID: <87zi37og4h.fsf@morokweng.localdomain> References: <20180316203837.10174-1-bauerman@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Cc: linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org, keyrings@vger.kernel.org, linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Mimi Zohar , Dmitry Kasatkin , James Morris , "Serge E. Hallyn" , David Howells , David Woodhouse , Jessica Yu , Herbert Xu , "David S. Miller" , "AKASHI\, Takahiro" To: linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org Return-path: In-reply-to: <20180316203837.10174-1-bauerman@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-crypto.vger.kernel.org Thiago Jung Bauermann writes: > Now the modsig is only ignored if it references a signature that is not > present in IMA's keyring (or if there's a parsing error, obviously). If the The above should read "Now the modsig is only ignored if it references a *key* that is not present in IMA's keyring". Sorry, I only noticed the mistake after sending the emails. -- Thiago Jung Bauermann IBM Linux Technology Center