From: Christophe LEROY Subject: Re: [PATCH 01/11] crypto: shash: Remove VLA usage Date: Wed, 20 Jun 2018 22:39:58 +0200 Message-ID: <073a8f9e-8ad5-6fd5-e9b8-33e2c9a65e37@c-s.fr> References: <20180620190408.45104-1-keescook@chromium.org> <20180620190408.45104-2-keescook@chromium.org> <638faf05-946a-1345-dda4-f75fee5b07d9@c-s.fr> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Cc: Herbert Xu , "Gustavo A. R. Silva" , Alasdair Kergon , Arnd Bergmann , Eric Biggers , Giovanni Cabiddu , Lars Persson , Mike Snitzer , Rabin Vincent , Tim Chen , "David S. Miller" , linux-crypto , qat-linux@intel.com, dm-devel@redhat.com, LKML To: Kees Cook Return-path: In-Reply-To: Content-Language: fr Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-crypto.vger.kernel.org Le 20/06/2018 à 22:36, Kees Cook a écrit : > On Wed, Jun 20, 2018 at 12:30 PM, Christophe Leroy > wrote: >> >> >> On 06/20/2018 07:03 PM, Kees Cook wrote: >>> >>> In the quest to remove all stack VLA usage from the kernel[1], this >>> removes the VLAs in SHASH_DESC_ON_STACK (via crypto_shash_descsize()) >>> by using the maximum allowable size (which is now more clearly captured >>> in a macro). Similar limits are turned into macros as well. >>> >>> [1] >>> https://lkml.kernel.org/r/CA+55aFzCG-zNmZwX4A2FQpadafLfEzK6CC=qPXydAacU1RqZWA@mail.gmail.com >>> >>> Signed-off-by: Kees Cook >> >> >> Got the following warnings: >> >> crypto/testmgr.c: In function ‘alg_test_crc32c.part.4’: >> crypto/testmgr.c:1896:1: warning: the frame size of 2088 bytes is larger >> than 1024 bytes [-Wframe-larger-than=] >> crypto/hmac.c: In function ‘hmac_setkey’: >> crypto/hmac.c:88:1: warning: the frame size of 2088 bytes is larger than >> 1024 bytes [-Wframe-larger-than=] > > Ah yes. I didn't do 32-bit builds. So, here's the issue: this uncovers > the frame size problems that were hidden by in being a VLA before. It > was always possible for the frame to get this big, it's just that the > compiler couldn't see it. > > For qat, I raised the -Wframe-larger-than flag. It seems we'll need to > do this in some other places too. Maybe the issue is because I have selected 16k pages ? Christophe > > -Kees >