From: Pavel Machek Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/4][RFC v2] Introduce the in-kernel hibernation encryption Date: Wed, 18 Jul 2018 22:22:35 +0200 Message-ID: <20180718202235.GA4132@amd> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="ZGiS0Q5IWpPtfppv" Cc: "Rafael J . Wysocki" , Eric Biggers , Len Brown , "Lee, Chun-Yi" , Theodore Ts o , Stephan Mueller , Denis Kenzior , linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, "Gu, Kookoo" , "Zhang, Rui" To: Chen Yu Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-crypto.vger.kernel.org --ZGiS0Q5IWpPtfppv Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Thu 2018-07-19 00:38:06, Chen Yu wrote: > As security becomes more and more important, we add the in-kernel > encryption support for hibernation. Sorry, this does not really explain what security benefit it is supposed have to against what attack scenarios. Which unfortunately means it can not reviewed. Note that uswsusp already provides encryption. If this is supposed to have advantages over it, please say so. Pavel --=20 (english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek (cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blo= g.html --ZGiS0Q5IWpPtfppv Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: Digital signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1 iEYEARECAAYFAltPoYsACgkQMOfwapXb+vKdrgCfUQP2u+ZlEhNDSLldzKr8dcxd ne0An1BJyqc3NUoaj8S10n3/0GMlehL5 =xZmc -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --ZGiS0Q5IWpPtfppv--