From: Joe Perches Subject: Re: [PATCH] Performance Improvement in CRC16 Calculations. Date: Sat, 11 Aug 2018 02:04:06 -0700 Message-ID: <8e63583eb6898c3f481f1cb45b067234737a11b4.camel@perches.com> References: <1533928331-21303-1-git-send-email-jeff.lien@wdc.com> <9b5b906f42dfab78f382c90f66851717d258a15d.camel@perches.com> <75d66dfa-688b-f941-04fd-5a39cf882b21@interlog.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Jeff Lien , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org, linux-block@vger.kernel.org, linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, herbert@gondor.apana.org.au, tim.c.chen@linux.intel.com, martin.petersen@oracle.com, david.darrington@wdc.com, jeff.furlong@wdc.com To: dgilbert@interlog.com, Nicolas Pitre Return-path: In-Reply-To: <75d66dfa-688b-f941-04fd-5a39cf882b21@interlog.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-crypto.vger.kernel.org On Fri, 2018-08-10 at 22:39 -0400, Douglas Gilbert wrote: > but below is a copy and paste of a table 27 from draft SBC-4 > revision 15 in chapter 4.22.4.4 on page 87. The posted code returns the proper crc for each CONFIG_CRYPTO_CRCT10DIF_TABLE_SIZE value from 1 to 5 for these arrays.