From: Herbert Xu Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v6 00/23] WireGuard: Secure Network Tunnel Date: Tue, 2 Oct 2018 11:49:25 +0800 Message-ID: <20181002034925.5zbhoiq7yj44dy6d@gondor.apana.org.au> References: <20181002033908.324yhwqaohfsq65d@gondor.apana.org.au> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: Ard Biesheuvel , Eric Biggers , LKML , Netdev , Linux Crypto Mailing List , David Miller , Greg Kroah-Hartman To: "Jason A. Donenfeld" Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-crypto.vger.kernel.org Hi Jason: On Tue, Oct 02, 2018 at 05:45:20AM +0200, Jason A. Donenfeld wrote: > Hi Herbert, > > > I agree. I don't have any problems with the zinc code living in > > its own git tree. But any upstream merges should definitely go > > through the crypto tree because the inherent ties between the two > > code-base. > > I can send you pull requests then if there are development cycles when > there are in fact relations between the two trees. I'll update the > commit message describing Zinc to include this. I think all merges should go through the crypto tree so that the kernel crypto community has oversight over the crypto implementations. Cheers, -- Email: Herbert Xu Home Page: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/ PGP Key: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/pubkey.txt