From: Eric Biggers Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v6 11/23] zinc: import Andy Polyakov's Poly1305 ARM and ARM64 implementations Date: Tue, 2 Oct 2018 23:12:37 -0700 Message-ID: <20181003061236.GB745@sol.localdomain> References: <20180925145622.29959-1-Jason@zx2c4.com> <20180925145622.29959-12-Jason@zx2c4.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: "Jason A. Donenfeld" , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org, davem@davemloft.net, gregkh@linuxfoundation.org, Samuel Neves , Andy Lutomirski , Jean-Philippe Aumasson , Russell King , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org To: Andy Polyakov Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20180925145622.29959-12-Jason@zx2c4.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-crypto.vger.kernel.org On Tue, Sep 25, 2018 at 04:56:10PM +0200, Jason A. Donenfeld wrote: > These NEON and non-NEON implementations come from Andy Polyakov's > implementation, and are included here in raw form without modification, > so that subsequent commits that fix these up for the kernel can see how > it has changed. This awkward commit splitting has been requested for the > ARM[64] implementations in particular. > > While this is CRYPTOGAMS code, the originating code for this happens to > be the same as OpenSSL's commit 5bb1cd2292b388263a0cc05392bb99141212aa53 Sorry to ruin the fun, but actually there are no Poly1305 implementations in CRYPTOGAMS (https://github.com/dot-asm/cryptogams). Nor are there any ChaCha20 implementations. Andy P., can you please add your Poly1305 and ChaCha20 implementations to the CRYPTOGAMS repository, so that they have a clear kernel-compatible license? It would be great if you'd include a kernel-compatible license directly in the versions in the OpenSSL tree too... Thanks! - Eric