From: Ard Biesheuvel Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v6 23/23] net: WireGuard secure network tunnel Date: Wed, 3 Oct 2018 16:25:51 +0200 Message-ID: References: <20180925145622.29959-1-Jason@zx2c4.com> <20180925145622.29959-24-Jason@zx2c4.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Cc: LKML , Netdev , Linux Crypto Mailing List , David Miller , Greg Kroah-Hartman To: "Jason A. Donenfeld" Return-path: In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-crypto.vger.kernel.org On 3 October 2018 at 16:13, Ard Biesheuvel wrote: > On 3 October 2018 at 16:12, Jason A. Donenfeld wrote: >> Hi Ard, >> >> On Wed, Oct 3, 2018 at 1:15 PM Ard Biesheuvel wrote: >>> > +config WIREGUARD >>> > + tristate "WireGuard secure network tunnel" >>> > + depends on NET && INET >>> >>> I think you need to add IPV6 here >> >> Nope. Like much of the net tree, WireGuard can function on ipv6-less >> kernels. If you do find something in WireGuard isn't working in a >> v6-less configuration, I consider that to be a bug that needs fixing. >> > > OK. I hit a build error yesterday, and setting CONFIG_IPV6 fixed it. > Let me see if I can reproduce. I get drivers/net/wireguard/socket.o: In function `send6': socket.c:(.text+0x56c): undefined reference to `ipv6_chk_addr' drivers/net/wireguard/socket.o: In function `wg_socket_send_skb_to_peer': socket.c:(.text+0x904): undefined reference to `ipv6_chk_addr' drivers/net/wireguard/socket.o: In function `wg_socket_init': socket.c:(.text+0x161c): undefined reference to `ipv6_mod_enabled' if I build my kernel with WireGuard built in but IPv6 support enabled as a module.