From: "Jason A. Donenfeld" Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 1/9] kernel: add support for patchable function pointers Date: Fri, 5 Oct 2018 19:37:44 +0200 Message-ID: References: <20181005081333.15018-1-ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org> <20181005081333.15018-2-ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org> <20181005141433.GS19272@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net> <9E0E08C8-0DFC-4E50-A4FA-73208835EF9E@amacapital.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Cc: Ard Biesheuvel , Peter Zijlstra , LKML , Eric Biggers , Samuel Neves , Arnd Bergmann , Herbert Xu , David Miller , Catalin Marinas , Will Deacon , benh@kernel.crashing.org, paulus@samba.org, Michael Ellerman , Thomas Gleixner , mingo@redhat.com, Kees Cook , "Martin K. Petersen" , Greg Kroah-Hartman , Andrew Morton , richard@nod.at, Linux Crypto Mailing List , l To: Andrew Lutomirski Return-path: In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-crypto.vger.kernel.org On Fri, Oct 5, 2018 at 7:29 PM Andy Lutomirski wrote: > (None of this is to say that I disagree with Jason, though -- I'm not > entirely convinced that this makes sense for Zinc. But maybe it can > be done in a way that makes everyone happy.) Zinc indeed will continue to push in the simpler and more minimal direction. Down the line I'm open to trying and benching a few different ways of going about it with dynamic patching -- something that will be pretty easy to experiment with given the lean structure of Zinc -- but for the initial merge I intend to do it the way it is, which is super fast and pretty straightforward to follow. Jason