Return-Path: Received: from a9-99.smtp-out.amazonses.com ([54.240.9.99]:47942 "EHLO a9-99.smtp-out.amazonses.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1725987AbeKTFoF (ORCPT ); Tue, 20 Nov 2018 00:44:05 -0500 Date: Mon, 19 Nov 2018 19:19:04 +0000 From: Christopher Lameter To: Jerome Glisse cc: Jason Gunthorpe , Leon Romanovsky , Kenneth Lee , Tim Sell , linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, Alexander Shishkin , Zaibo Xu , zhangfei.gao@foxmail.com, linuxarm@huawei.com, haojian.zhuang@linaro.org, Hao Fang , Gavin Schenk , RDMA mailing list , Zhou Wang , Doug Ledford , =?ISO-8859-15?Q?Uwe_Kleine-K=F6nig?= , David Kershner , Kenneth Lee , Johan Hovold , Cyrille Pitchen , Sagar Dharia , Jens Axboe , guodong.xu@linaro.org, linux-netdev , Randy Dunlap , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Vinod Koul , linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org, Philippe Ombredanne , Sanyog Kale , "David S. Miller" , linux-accelerators@lists.ozlabs.org Subject: Re: [RFCv3 PATCH 1/6] uacce: Add documents for WarpDrive/uacce In-Reply-To: <20181119184215.GB4593@redhat.com> Message-ID: <010001672d69716a-743e5098-eb2f-41ca-bf98-6e17eaaba00f-000000@email.amazonses.com> References: <20181113002354.GO3695@mtr-leonro.mtl.com> <95310df4-b32c-42f0-c750-3ad5eb89b3dd@gmail.com> <20181114160017.GI3759@mtr-leonro.mtl.com> <20181115085109.GD157308@Turing-Arch-b> <20181115145455.GN3759@mtr-leonro.mtl.com> <20181119091405.GE157308@Turing-Arch-b> <20181119091910.GF157308@Turing-Arch-b> <20181119104801.GF8268@mtr-leonro.mtl.com> <20181119164853.GA4593@redhat.com> <20181119182752.GA4890@ziepe.ca> <20181119184215.GB4593@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-crypto-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Mon, 19 Nov 2018, Jerome Glisse wrote: > > IIRC this is solved in IB by automatically calling > > madvise(MADV_DONTFORK) before creating the MR. > > > > MADV_DONTFORK > > .. This is useful to prevent copy-on-write semantics from changing the > > physical location of a page if the parent writes to it after a > > fork(2) .. > > This would work around the issue but this is not transparent ie > range marked with DONTFORK no longer behave as expected from the > application point of view. Why would anyone expect a range registered via MR behave as normal? Device I/O is going on into that range. Memory is already special. > Also it relies on userspace doing the right thing (which is not > something i usualy trust :)). This has been established practice for 15 or so years in a couple of use cases. Again user space already has to be doing special things in order to handle RDMA is that area.