Return-Path: Received: from orcrist.hmeau.com ([104.223.48.154]:45136 "EHLO deadmen.hmeau.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726559AbeKTNdo (ORCPT ); Tue, 20 Nov 2018 08:33:44 -0500 Date: Tue, 20 Nov 2018 11:06:35 +0800 From: Herbert Xu To: Eric Biggers Cc: "Jason A. Donenfeld" , Ard Biesheuvel , Linux Crypto Mailing List , linux-fscrypt@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, LKML , Paul Crowley , Greg Kaiser , Samuel Neves , Tomer Ashur Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] zinc chacha20 generic implementation using crypto API code Message-ID: <20181120030635.xfr543j5nngxfnxk@gondor.apana.org.au> References: <20181105232526.173947-1-ebiggers@kernel.org> <20181105232526.173947-11-ebiggers@kernel.org> <20181112185816.GA8663@gmail.com> <20181116060227.hwu4igi6bp26ddpi@gondor.apana.org.au> <20181117001718.GA175522@gmail.com> <20181119052451.qttzfgcm4hvbdc4u@gondor.apana.org.au> <20181119225414.GB258711@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20181119225414.GB258711@gmail.com> Sender: linux-crypto-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Mon, Nov 19, 2018 at 02:54:15PM -0800, Eric Biggers wrote: > > > I think the remaining issue right now is how to order my series and > > Eric's series. If Eric's goes in first, it means that I can either a) > > spend some time developing Zinc further _now_ to support chacha12 and > > keep the top two conversion patches, or b) just drop the top two > > conversion patches and work that out carefully with Eric after. I > > think (b) would be better, but I'm happy to do (a) if you disagree. > > And as I mentioned in the last email, I'd prefer Eric's work to go in > > after Zinc, but I don't think the reasoning for that is particularly > > strong, so it seems fine to merge Eric's work first. > > > > I'll post v9 pretty soon and you can see how things are shaping up. > > Hopefully before then Eric/Ard/you can provide some feedback on > > whether you'd prefer (a) or (b) above. > > > > I'd still prefer to see the conversion patches included. Skipping them would be > kicking the can down the road and avoiding issues that will need to be addressed > anyway. Like you, I don't want a "half-baked concoction that will be maybe > possibly be replaced 'later'" :-) Are you guys talking about the conversion patches to eliminate the two copies of chacha code that would otherwise exist in crypto as well as in zinc? If so I think that's not negotiable. Having two copies of the same code is just not acceptable. Cheers, -- Email: Herbert Xu Home Page: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/ PGP Key: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/pubkey.txt